Parents of students found guilty of cultism in Lagos State might be liable for punishment if a bill for a law to provide for the prohibition of unlawful societies and cultism in Lagos and for connected purposes is passed into law.
This was part of the submission of some lawmakers at the Lagos State House of Assembly during plenary on Tuesday while discussing a bill sent by the Attorney-General of the State, Mr. Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN).
The Speaker of the House, Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Obasa said that there was need to differentiate among the various types of cultism in the country.
“There is need to differentiate amongst the types of cultism in the country so that we won’t solve one problem and create another. We need to look at the way and manner weapons are used. The existing law should be seriously looked into,” he suggested.
He further committed the bill to the House committee on Judiciary, which was directed to report to the House in three weeks.
In his contribution, the Majority Leader of the House, Sanai Agunbiade representing Ikorodu 1, averred that sponsorship of cultism could not be captured under the bill, saying that some of the cult groups have their sponsors.
Agunbiade who said that limit of the jurisdiction of the offences could not be limited, referred to Section 12 and said that there must be a proof before suspending any student found guilty of cultism.
He adds, “Suspension of students without proven guilty is already a punishment”.
“There must be a prove before suspension. The suspected student should be investigated before suspension. Parents of students who engage in any cult group should also be liable,” he said.
Representing Eti-Osa Constituency 02, Gbolahan Yishawu, said that the Bill was presented as it was a new bill, saying it should be an amendment bill.
He added that the scoop of the bill should be expanded, adding that it falls short of its own intendment.
His words, “Cultism is what we need to guide against with the information we are hearing on terrorism.”
Rotimi Olowo representing Somolu 1 soon noted that cultism had gone beyond schools environment. “This should not be limited to schools. It should be extended into the society”, he recommended.
Olowo further cited example of Aye Fraternity eighth day celebration held in his constituency that resulted in destruction of properties.
Hence, he posited that some of the police officers are in cult groups, arguing that the bill would nip various cult groups in the state in the bud.
Hon. Kehinde Joseph posited that the bill was not comprehensive enough.
“If you see what is going on especially when this pandemic started, female beggars, who sat along the road were impregnated and they gave birth to children. Who are the people that impregnated them? Some of the guys did so. I will also support that proposition that parents of those found guilty of cultism must be you punished,”he said.
Hon. Yinka Ogundimu representing Agege 1 emphasised that cultism is very rampant in primary schools. “While looking into punishment of those found guilty, rehabilitation of the minors who belong to the group should be looked into”.
He stressed that students in tertiary institutions, who are found guilty must be prosecuted.
According to Desmond Elliot, representing Surulere 1 the bill was not robust to cater for the larger society. “The bill looks childish to me. The bill is supposed to take care of orientation of children,” he said.
Hon. David Setonji, representing Badagry Constituency 2, said that the issue of cultism is a major challenges in the implementation of laws.
For Setonji, “We have laws and we need to empower the security agencies to implement the existing laws.”
